Side Project Derivation blend 2, Trying to Smooth down those bean flickers

Welp this morning has been fraught with controversy for the St. Louis contingency.  From the recent peachy pitted Smooth release came typical secondary market dramatics and theatrics that seem to inevitably accompany nearly every SP release.  So to get our minds off of who is a razzler and what facebook groups are full of cockfingerers (all of them), let’s instead look back on one of those coldstone creamery bombs that got us to where we are today: DERIVATION SECOND BLEND: the revenge: reloaded: eternal: with a vanilla VENGEANCE.

der1

So it’s an ultra coveted stout with vanilla beans? So the fuck what, what else is new? WELP let’s allow those Side Projectionists to flesh this one out:

“Derivation is our series of Barrel-Aged Imperial Stouts in which we brew several recipes, age them in a variety of barrels and blend them before bottling to add depth and structure to this massive style of beer.

Blend #2
50% Wheated Imperial Stout aged in a Weller Antique Wheated Bourbon Barrel with Ugandan Vanilla Beans
50% Wheated Imperial Stout aged in a Weller Reserve Wheated Bourbon Barrel with Ugandan Vanilla Beans”

A few cases have been sold at Side Project occasionally as an “onsite only” bottle for like $75 (?) and I think something like 100 of these were sold at the old Wine and Cheese whale factory. That’s it, so basically cable car pumped with Bane serum.

The pour looks viscous and pushes the limits of what I will tolerate for that 02-40w synthetic look.  Aside from perhaps  Double Barrel Huna and Bourbon Vanilla Dark Lord, I cant recall a beer that has a pour this thick and menacing.  It is sheets of raw obsidian, as dark as the hearts of Mumford and Sons, except I actually like this beer.  AND I HATE VOLCANIC OBSIDIAN.

The nose is absolutely outrageous in the Platonic form: a cause of outrage.  This is largely due to the inaccessibility of this beer and the refined riff on the tired vanilla cone brownie sesh.  This isn’t Yankee Candle, or Pilsburry frosting, or a one dimensional Glade plug in, this is a nose that lingers and unpacks itself in layers.  The wheated whiskey barrels add a level of heat, butterscotch, caramel ribbon, prailines, and other Froyo toppings that is almost unmatched.  The vanilla certainly is center stage, but is more akin to an ensemble cast.  All work in tandem for greatness, like the 96 Bulls, there’s more than Vanilla Jordan OKAY.

der

Oddly the taste isn’t quite as bean pod spreading as I expected and it honestly reminds me more of Assassin given the complexity of the barrel.  Antecedent to the waffle cone is brownie, fudge batter, tollhouse chips, marzapan and like…rice krispy treats? This sounds far sweeter than it is and the underlying fusel body tempers the experience from becoming some Willy Wonka gangbang.

So should this command double to triple the value that Fundamental Observation or Vanilla Rye does?  It really comes down to preference at a certain point.  Should you pay more to stunt on people with a world class ZONDA when you can buy a more “reasonable” Aventador? I mean…I guess? I am not here to tell you how to flick your bean, you can hit backstagecastingcouch for that. This is undoubtedly the top of its class and minor preferences set it apart from the best in the world.

van4

Who really wants to be a part of that crew? come on.

I wouldn’t look at the blind BA vanilla tasting and snub this beer for “only” getting 4th out of 19, look at what it had to go up against and look how close the metrics were in the results.  I cant really address my full “audience” with reviews like these, so for the joel66ers of the world or people who have those giantslayer 9 person Philly tasting groups who go in on bottles like this, absolutely lock this down before it fades like DISAPPOINTING ASS 2010 BCBVS.  GET IT TOGETHER OLD MAN.

TFW wen u don win den has 2x(sads)

der2

Advertisements

One thought on “Side Project Derivation blend 2, Trying to Smooth down those bean flickers

  1. This Gansta Shiznit cracks me the funk up.

    I have to tell the DDB crew that this guy is the real dizzzeal.

    As a guy who generally gets to drink all of the crazy St. Louis(ness) there is to offer, I opine on my favorite review here:

    If you have the obligatory chance to try all 4 Derivations (being a derivation of that oh so wonderful Perennial Abraxas/Sump/17/Maman stout base – for you non-math wizard Derivation means Derivative of something, think the Big Short with out all of the intellectual masterubation) one with a pallet (not a cycle reference) would rank them as follows:

    D 1
    D 2
    D 4
    D3

    You see, as far as good beer goes – bottle counts have no impact. Now I know that’s hard to believe for all of those booboise BA tickers, but it really is true.

    The real deal is as follows – if you love big, viscous BA stouts, D2 is great (NOT ALPINE) but not quite as complex as D1.

    Yet, all taste is subjective, so what does a ticker know.

    As always, love this site with all of it’s gangsta shiznit to kick off the year.

    Here’s to 2016 and the best year of DDB to come.

    Hopefully, we will get a chance to meet up at those TG releases circa late 2016.

    Josh

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s